the Rubik's Cube of development



Generally speaking,



when we think about development, we often picture a linear, step-by-step process. first this, then that, and so on. but the real work of creation and  innovation isn't a straight line. it's more like a Rubik's Cube—a dynamic, multi-dimensional puzzle where one turn affects the entire system.

progress isn't about solving one row at a time. it’s about understanding the interconnectedness of different dimensions, so that a "right move" on one side helps align the others. my own development approach is built on three such dimensions, each with three key layers.

first the time perspective

development doesn't happen in a vacuum.it’s shaped by our past, our present, and our vision for the future. we must understand the history of an idea to see its current state and predict where it can go. every project is a continuation of what came before and a foundation for what's next.

second the matter and non-matter factors

this dimension is about the interplay between what we can touch and what we can feel. it includes our physiological aspects—the physical, mental, and cognitive effort we put in—as well as the intuition and connection that guide us. we need both the logical, structured thinking and the gut feelings to find the right solutions. it’s the balance between the measurable and the intuitive.

third the units of development

the final dimension is about scale. are we developing at an individual level, focusing on a person's growth? or are we innovating for the market, creating a new product or service? or is our goal to influence society, building something that impacts communities and institutions? The scope of our work defines its impact. 

how do we make a move on this development cube? consider this example:

imagine a new app designed to improve mental well-being.

  • the time perspective would involve looking at the history of mental health tools, analyzing the present demand, and forecasting future user needs.

  • the matter and non-matter factors would require both physiological development—the technical coding, the user interface design—and a deep intuitive understanding of the emotional needs of the user.

  • finally, the units of development would define its target: is it a tool for a specific individual, a platform for a niche market, or a scalable solution for society? the best scenario case: it is a powerful tool for an individual and it has a positive impact on market and society. 

turn we make on one dimension affects the other two. the goal isn't just to solve one side of the cube, but to find a perfect alignment of all three dimensions—time, matter, and unit—to create a complete and meaningful solution.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

wanna ask about meters? instead ask about intelligence

Image
the transformation from passive audiences to active communities in every energy revolution, the first barrier isn’t technology—it's imagination. when we first talked about vehicle-to-grid (V2G), people said it was impossible. when we integrated predictive models for wind and thunderstorms and their impacts, it was laughed at. today, we stand at a similar frontier with autonomous robotics and truly intelligent energy communities, and once again, we hear the familiar chorus of skepticism, often focused on a single, outdated question. "but how can you trade energy without a certified meter on every wall?" it’s a valid question, but it’s rooted in the past. it’s like asking how a car can navigate without seeing the horse in front of it. it misses the entire point of the paradigm shift. the future of energy isn't about hardware; it's about collective intelligence. the old world vs. the new: the power of the digital twin the old world relies on isolated data points. a s...
Read more

building systemic positive change to support humanity

Image
the suggested idea is that the elements of organizational learning and change described by Senge such as systems thinking, personal mastery, mental models, shared vision, and team learning can best be realized and lead to sustainable change when they acknowledge and support people's fundamental needs at the various levels of Maslow's hierarchy. to understand our behaviour in the face of transformations unlike never before seen, it is beneficial to do some cross checking about thema. The objective is to achieve a smooth intersection in between these two theoretical and also most practical entities.  basic needs and psycological safety and security when a community is undergoing significant change (e.g., through automation and digitalization), people's basic need for security (job security, livelihood, predictability) can be threatened. systems thinking helps in understanding the broader impacts of the change and planning it so that basic security is maintained or even impro...
Read more

unlocking the door to web3

Image
in 2017, bookmarked a webpage that piqued my interest. although it took several years before i could give it proper attention, never considered removing it from my favorites. my curiosity about high-tech and the unique content kept my interest alive. the webpage and its content, with all its peculiar creatures and drawings, struck me as somewhat naive. yet, it was also different, and i was curious about the individuals behind it. they were mostly young adults with a high-tech orientation, and their idealism was reflected in their work. they seemed to be building a new world and society with a fresh perspective that was unfamiliar to my generation. initially, it was the icon that intrigued me. its shape resembled a diamond, but with an imperfect, unpolished structure. the ecosystem's interface was particularly striking; it presented a purely digital landscape, devoid of any human representation or reflection of reality. this was digitization in its purest form. i had been searching...
Read more